Huw,
Thanks for the reply.
The SGC terms don't necessarily throw me off, it's just not knowing where the SGC is measuring from. As you can see in my image, I can derive any measurement I need to plug into the SGC from my digital mock-up. In my current state. I'm trying to get the SGC to plot my geometry so that I can see how it performs.
Entering in one value, but not being allowed to finish all the values to be input is frustrating. If there was a way to toggle off the design constraints long enough to do the data entry, that would be helpful
If there were a diagram for each field that can be entered into the SGC showing how the measurements are taken, that would be enough for me to translate on my end.
I did notice, however that the front view of the SGC does not take into account the Z aixs of the vehicle. Such variables as toe-in/toe-oiut (related to steering arm length) or caster (for anti-dive) during bump steer could be solved if the pivot control points could be plotted in 3d.
I am, admittedly, starting from the mathematical perspective, as opposed to taking measurements from an existing unit, I don't want to ask for a change to SGC if the intent behind it is simply other than what I am looking for.
I can recommend the Adams book (especially for it's price $20) because it establishes the relationships between each component and the resulting effect on the dynamics of the vehicle as a whole. Fascinating stuff for a nerd like me..
I'd be happy to elaborate if it helps you at all..
Repsects,
Erin
|